Legal Opinion
Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Moreno Valley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1996No. Nos. 95-55529, 95-55531PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge PREGERSON; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT.
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (“Desert”) and Outdoor Media Group, Inc. (“OMG”) are billboard operators who conduct business in the City of Moreno Valley. In a suit against the City and several of its public officials, appellants challenged the constitutionality of Moreno Valley Ordinance No. 133, which regulates structures and signs. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the City and granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of the public officials. The court denied appellants’…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Regional Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Solantic, LLC v. City of Neptune BeachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- GET OUTDOORS II, LLC v. City of San Diego, Cal.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- S.O.C., Inc. v. County of ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- 4805 Convoy, Inc., a California Corporation v. City of San Diego, a Political Subdivision of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.