Legal Opinion

Cochran's Adm'x v. Yeiser

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 4, 1943Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

In Cochran’s Adm’x v. Cochran, 273 Ky. 1, 115 S. W. (2d) 376, we expressed the conclusion that among other transactions the late W. E. Cochran had diverted the proceeds of the sale of property in Michigan to his son and daughter in fraud of the marital rights of his wife. A note for $3,816 received by Cochran as part of the proceeds had been transferred to his son, George A. Cochran, and the maker had paid him. We ruled that the widow was entitled to an accounting for her distributable share.

Mrs. Cochran, as administratrix and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cochran's Adm'x v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. McCarty v. Louisville Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Davis v. CaricoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  4. Gibbs v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Byington v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API