Legal Opinion

Jackson v. L.D. McReynolds, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1983No. 81-1010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment denying the equitable remedy of specific performance of an "option to purchase" real property contained in a leasehold contract between Plaintiff/Appellant William H. Jackson and Defendant/Appellee L.D. McReynolds, Inc.1 Additionally, Plaintiffs claim damages for alleged injury and losses suffered by Defendant's fraudulent misrepresentations concerning the property's state of title. The trial court, after ore tenus hearing, found for the Defendants.

We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On October 21, 1975, Plaintiff William H. Jackson and co-defendant L.D. McReynolds,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Asbury v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Baker v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Hunter v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  4. Kennedy v. HerringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Kirkland v. O'KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Keelboat Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Caldwell v. SnyderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Alabama Processing Co. v. Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Jackson v. L.D. McReynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API