Salle Ex Rel. Mandel v. Holland Furnace Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLINGSWORTH, Judge.
Defendant has appealed from an order of the trial court setting aside a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ action, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. Its contention is that no timely motion for a new trial was filed and that, in the absence of the filing of such motion, the trial court was without jurisdiction to set aside the order of dismissal following a lapse of more than 30 days after it was made. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we are convinced that defendant’s contention is sound and that the judgment of dismissal must stand.
Plaintiffs’ action was filed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wooten v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- City of Jefferson v. Capital City Oil CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Murray v. United Zinc Smelting Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- Guhman v. GrotheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shirrell v. Missouri Edison Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Ballew v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Euge v. Lemay Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Myers v. MorenoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Fletcher v. North British & Mercantile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.