Legal Opinion

Kobeck v. Nabisco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 17, 1983No. 65879PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Plaintiff Carol T. Kobeck brought this action against defendant Nabisco, Inc. and Harold Carmical alleging invasion of privacy and seeking damages of $10,000,000 for “pain and suffering, emotional anguish and psychological damages,” $5,000,000 for “loss of services, companionship and affection of [her deceased husband] Ronnie Kobeck,” and $5,000,000 for “aggravated damages.” Following the completion of pretrial discovery, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment from which plaintiff brings this appeal.

The material facts in this case are essentially without…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Cabaniss v. HipsleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Whitley v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Cochran v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  5. Appling v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Troncalli v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Cox Communications, Inc. v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Jarrett v. ButtsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Davis v. Emmis Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Dry Storage Corp. v. PiscopoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API