Legal Opinion

Earnest v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1952No. 11436_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was sentenced in the Middle District of Tennessee upon several indictments charging violation of the postal laws and the robbery of post offices. One of these indictments was returned by a grand jury sitting in Kentucky. To it, the appellant pleaded guilty, after the case was transferred from Kentucky to Tennessee under the provisions of Rule 20 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.

Thereafter, he filed a petition for the vacation of this sentence under § 2255 of Tit. 28, U.S.C.A., and now appeals from a judgment overruling it.

The only seemingly meritorious contention…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Levine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. BinkDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Clifford Branan, United States of America v. Fred Jackson Fritts, United States of America v. Olen Lee HendonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. MarcelloDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
  3. United States v. BrysonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1954
  4. James Norman Yeloushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. Jacob PolinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API