Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. Knapp Brown & Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from the Municipal Court of ¡the City of Sioux Falls. Hon. Alpha F. Orr, Judge. Action by The Inner Shoe Tire Company, against Knapp Brown & Company, to recover for value of goods shipped 'by plaintiff to defendant under a written order. From a judgment for defendant, ¡and' from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (i) To point one of the opinion, Appellant ¡cited: Civ. Code, Sec. 1239; .De Rue v. McIntosh, 26 S. D. 42, 127 N. W. 532; Gail Mfg.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Municipal Court of ¡the City of Sioux Falls. Hon. Alpha F. Orr, Judge. Action by The Inner Shoe Tire Company, against Knapp Brown & Company, to recover for value of goods shipped 'by plaintiff to defendant under a written order. From a judgment for defendant, ¡and' from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals. (i) To point one of the opinion, Appellant ¡cited: Civ. Code, Sec. 1239; .De Rue v. McIntosh, 26 S. D. 42, 127 N. W. 532; Gail Mfg. Co. v. Finkelstein, (Tex.) 59 S. W. 571; Cameron Coal & Merc. Co. v. Octave Block et ah, (Okla.) 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 618; Ohio…
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover an amount which it claimed to be due for goods shipped, defendant under a written order, which order was in words and figures as follows:
Order No. 142. Aug. 17, 1914.
Inner Shoe Tire Company.
Ship to Knapp Brown & Co., at Sioux Falls, S. D.
How ship: Fgt. When: At once.
Terms: 5%. iod. 30 net.
Red Inner Shoes.
4 -32x3>4 ................................$ 6 75 '$ 27 00
8 33X4 .................'................. 9 25 74 00
1 34x4 .................................. 9 25 9 25
1 35x4^ ................................ 11 75 11 75
4 36x414…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Babcock v. D. Deford & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Janssen v. MullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Head v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891