Legal Opinion

Saxon v. Ames

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery court of Oktibbeha county. Pollard, Chancellor. The opinion states the case sufficiently.

1Opinion of the Court

Simrall, J.:

Proceedings were instituted in the probate court, by the petitioners, a portion of the heirs of John Hollinshead, deceased, for the partition of the real estate descended. Associated with these heirs in the petition, were persons who had purchased at bankrupt sale, the undivided interest of two of the heirs. The remedy, particularly defining the mode of conducting such a suit, is given by article 117 of the Code of 1857, p. 454. The court made a decree of partition, appointing therein commissioners to carry it out. It is objected, and mainly relied upon for error by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ingersoll v. IngersollMississippi Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Pollock v. BuieMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Wells v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burrus v. BurrusMississippi Supreme Court · 1878
  2. In re Armistead's EstateDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API