Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Michigan

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1988No. Docket 110073PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We decide this case on order of the Supreme Court, which remanded it to us "for reconsideration in light of Velmer v Baraga Area Schools, 430 Mich 385 [424 NW2d 770] (1988), and Reardon v Dep’t of Mental Health and Schafer v Ethridge, 430 Mich 398 [424 NW2d 248] (1988)”. In this Court’s original opinion, the panel affirmed a Court of Claims judgment in favor of plaintiff, Ella Hemphill. Judge Beasley dissented, stating that the majority opinion rested on an unwarranted expansion of the defective building exception to the governmental immunity law. After reviewing the facts and the cases cited…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reardon v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Velmer v. Baraga Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Green v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Morris v. AlexanderMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Michigan National Bank v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Carlton v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API