Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Snodgrass

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 7, 1933No. 24199PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OULLISON, Y. O. J.

The record shows .that while Olay Snodgrass, respondent herein, was a practicing attorney, two charges were filed against him praying his disbarment. The first complaint discloses that Snodgrass was charged with misappropriating $350 of funds belonging to W. B. Stutts of Thornton, Tex. The second complaint discloses that Snodgrass was charged with misappropriation of $333.33 belonging to O. B. Siler.

A hearing on the first complaint was had before the administrative council. The council recommended to the Board of Governors that Snodgrass be disbarred. The Board of Governors…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Dabney v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re StumpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. In re WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Application of DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Application of MaupinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF TAYLORSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API