Legal Opinion

Loughran's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1940No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

This appeal involves the construction of the residu ary clause in a will. Appellant contends that by it all nephews and nieces except those explicitly excluded by the fourth, paragraph of the will are entitled to share the residuary estate. Appellees’ position is that the testator intended the residue to go to one nephew and five nieces not otherwise referred to in the will, to the exclusion of all others.

James H. Loughran, unmarried, a resident of Hazle-ton, executed a will on January 31, 1924 and died two days later leaving his mother, one brother, two sisters and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mizener's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Torchiana's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Moyer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Scott's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Baker & Wheeler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. KlingerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Baumann v. Baumann, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Wayne County1948
  3. Carmany EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Harris EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Keefer EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API