Legal Opinion

People v. Richardson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1975No. 46298PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer

The sole issue on this appeal is the constitutionality of section 14 — 2 of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 14 — 2), which permits eavesdropping if it is done with the consent of any one party to a conversation and at the request of a State’s Attorney. The circuit court of Cook County declared section 14 — 2 unconstitutional, and the State has appealed directly to this court under Supreme Court Rule 603 (50 Ill.2d R. 603).

The statute makes eavesdropping a Class A misdemeanor (section 14 — 4) and provides that evidence obtained through violation of the challenged…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. GainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. GoetzMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. GervasiIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API