Sparks v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Per curiam
This cause is before the court on rule herétofore issued against L. C. Little, attorney at law, to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt •df this court for making certain changes in the transcript of evidence filed in this court. After a careful review of all the evidence the court is of the opinion that the evidence is insufficient to show either that the changes were made by the respondent Little or by any one else at his direction, or with his knowledge or consent, or that in the preparation of his brief he used the record knowing that it had been changed. It is therefore…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Warner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
- Abbott v. Sherman Mines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937