Legal Opinion

Sears v. Griemsman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1963No. Nos. 3135, 3136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

This case is here for the second time. For convenience we shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court,

*299Plaintiff brought suit to annul his marriage to defendant. She counterclaimed for separate maintenance. The trial court granted the annulment and denied defendant’s maintenance claim on the ground that she was not a “wife” and therefore not entitled to support. The court’s ruling was founded upon a determination that plaintiff’s marriage to defendant was, under our Code, void and of no legal effect, because at the time of the marriage plaintiff was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mary Griemsman Sears v. John C. SearsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
  2. Sears v. SearsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGehee v. MaxfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API