Legal Opinion
Gennari v. Andres-Tucker Funeral Home, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1986No. 85-257PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.
The first issue posed by this appeal is whether R.C. 1721.18 applies to bar the defendant funeral home from operating its crematory without plaintiffs’ consent. We hold that the statute does not apply to defendant, and that the trial court erred in enjoining defendant’s use of the crematory.
R.C. 1721.18 provides in pertinent part:
“Any company or association incorporated for the erection and maintenance of a crematory may exercise all the rights and powers conferred by sections 1721.01 to 1721.18, inclusive, of the Revised Code, subject to the conditions provided in such sections. No building…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Saunders v. Clark County Zoning DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Northeast Ohio Elite Gymnastics Training Center, Inc. v. OsborneOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- King v. BognerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Homes by Calkins, Inc. v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- MacMillan v. City of Rocky RiverDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.