JUUL Labs Incorporated v. NJOY LLC, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 JUUL Labs Incorporated, No. CV-25-02853-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 NJOY LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue is Plaintiff JUUL Labs Incorporated’s Motion to Stay (Doc. 25), to which 16 Defendants NJOY, LLC, NJOY Holdings, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Altria Group 17 Distribution Company, and Altria Client Services LLC responded (Doc. 26), and Plaintiff 18 replied (Doc. 30). The Court finds this matter appropriate for decision without oral 19 argument. See LRCiv 7.2(f). For the reasons below, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Universal Electronics, Inc. v. Universal Remote Control, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Reid v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.