Legal Opinion

In re Town of Hempstead

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.

In this condemnation proceeding the Town of Hempstead has filed objections to two of the court’s findings, and the claimant objects to the quantum of interest which is set forth in the tentative decree, to wit: 4%.

Taking petitioner’s second objection first, it is the contention of the town that the court erred in ascribing an additional 10% increment in adjusting the comparable sales, by virtue of the accomplished rezoning on the subject parcel for residence purposes. The prime sales relied upon by the court were all sales of commercially zoned property in which the contracts of sale were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of City of N.Y. (Bronx River Parkway)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re Incorporated Village of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. City of Buffalo v. J. W. Clement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. In re City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In re the Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In re the Glen Cove Urban Renewal AgencyNew York Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API