Legal Opinion

Eddings v. Lippe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1991No. 90-310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Associate Justice.

The sole issue sought to be determined in this case is whether the trial court properly awarded attorney’s fees in a lien foreclosure action. However, we are unable to decide the issue because appellant failed to properly perfect his appeal under ARAP Rule 4. While this issue was not raised by the parties, this court is obliged to address jurisdiction requirements even when the parties do not. Widmer v. Touhey, 297 Ark. 85, 759 S.W.2d 562 (1988). Because the court is without jurisdiction, we dismiss this appeal.

In the action below, appellee attempted to foreclose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Widmer v. TouheySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Monk v. Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Phillips Construction Co. v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Alamo v. CoieCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API