Scalish v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
Sam Scalish, et al. 1 v. Commissioner.
Scalish v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 87670-87673.
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1962-46; 1962 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 262; 21 T.C.M. (CCH) 260; T.C.M. (RIA) 62046;
March 6, 1962
Arlene B. Steuer, Esq., and Michael E. Cozza, Esq., Leader Bldg., Cleveland, Ohio, for the petitioners. William C. Kollas, Esq., for the respondent.
FAY
Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion
FAY, Judge: In these consolidated proceedings, the Commissioner determined deficiencies in income tax for the calendar year 1956 as follows:
Docket
Defi-
No.
Petitioner
ciency
87670
Sam Scalish
$4,553.94
87671
F…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Thrifiticheck Service Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
- Nachman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Tobias v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Thrifticheck Service Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Houston Chronicle Publishing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Ralph A. Skilken and Loretta Skilken v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1969