Legal Opinion

Scalish v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 6, 1962No. Docket Nos. 87670-87673UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Scalish, et al. 1 v. Commissioner.

Scalish v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 87670-87673.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1962-46; 1962 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 262; 21 T.C.M. (CCH) 260; T.C.M. (RIA) 62046;

March 6, 1962

Arlene B. Steuer, Esq., and Michael E. Cozza, Esq., Leader Bldg., Cleveland, Ohio, for the petitioners. William C. Kollas, Esq., for the respondent.

FAY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

FAY, Judge: In these consolidated proceedings, the Commissioner determined deficiencies in income tax for the calendar year 1956 as follows:

Docket

Defi-

No.

Petitioner

ciency

87670

Sam Scalish

$4,553.94

87671

F…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  2. Thrifiticheck Service Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961
  4. Nachman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Tobias v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Thrifticheck Service Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Houston Chronicle Publishing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Ralph A. Skilken and Loretta Skilken v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Winn-Dixie Montgomery, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API