State v. Taylor
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAM, Justice:
Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of the crimes of burglary of a dwelling and attempted theft. His sole point on appeal is that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to try him, because of the provisions of Section 77-65-2, U.C.A. 1953, as amended in 1965.
Defendant was incarcerated in the state prison, and the charges for which he was subsequently convicted were pending. In accordance with Section 77-65-l(a), (b), he gave a written notice and request for final disposition of the pending charges to an authorized agent of the warden. The notice was dated April 18,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brimer v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PetersenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. BeanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- State v. VilesUtah Supreme Court · 1985