Legal Opinion

Garris v. McClain

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1960No. Appeal, 30PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chiee Justice Jones,

At the trial of this action in trespass for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff in an automobile accident, the court withdrew a. juror and continued the .case on the defendant’s motion because of an allegedly prejudicial question by plaintiff’s counsel in his' cross-examination of a witness for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed the order of continuance.

The appeal projects a rather anomalous procedural situation. Obviously, the trial terminated with the continuance and could not possibly be revived with a procedendo: The' case can…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coleman Motor Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Secada v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Glisson v. CARLINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Turay v. IrbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API