Garris v. McClain
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chiee Justice Jones,
At the trial of this action in trespass for damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff in an automobile accident, the court withdrew a. juror and continued the .case on the defendant’s motion because of an allegedly prejudicial question by plaintiff’s counsel in his' cross-examination of a witness for the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed the order of continuance.
The appeal projects a rather anomalous procedural situation. Obviously, the trial terminated with the continuance and could not possibly be revived with a procedendo: The' case can…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Coleman Motor Co., a Pennsylvania Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Secada v. WeinsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Glisson v. CARLINSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Turay v. IrbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Carter v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.