LaChapell v. Mawhinney
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:
1. In child custody cases involving a dispute between a surviving spouse and the maternal grandparents, is the doctrine of the best interests of the child an element to be considered in awarding custody?
2. Should a guardian ad litem have been appointed for the two children?
Custody — best interests doctrine.
In determining that custody of the two children here should be granted to William Mawhinney, the trial court felt that under Ponsford v. Crute (1972), 56 Wis. 2d 407, 202 N. W. 2d 5, it had no choice but to award custody to the surviving natural…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ponsford v. CruteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
3Cited by29 opinions
- Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, Curry First, Esq. And Melody Deshaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Barstad v. FrazierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Greenberg v. KmetkoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Sporleder v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.