Legal Opinion

Badiggo v. County of Ventura

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1989No. B032655PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Plaintiffs Robert and Maria Badiggo appeal the summary judgment entered in favor of the County of Ventura. We affirm and hold that the county is immune from liability for injuries Badiggo suffered while confined at the county’s work furlough facility. (Gov. Code, 1 §§ 844, 844.6.)

Facts

Plaintiff Robert Wayne Badiggo brought this action for personal injuries suffered when he fell descending the stairs at the Ventura County work furlough facility. His wife also sued for her loss of consortium. The county brought a motion for summary judgment, contending that it was immune from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garcia v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Jiminez v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Patricia J. v. Rio Linda Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Lowman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Fearon v. Department of CorrectionsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reed v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Terzian v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. (PC) Ward v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PC)Whatley v. CisnerosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API