Legal Opinion
Mack v. Tenneco Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided March 13, 1986No. Civ. A. No. 85-0145PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT F. COLLINS, District Judge.
The instant matter for summary judgment is before the Court on motion of defendant, Tenneco Oil Company (Tenneco) on the basis that it is entitled to a dismissal of this action pursuant to LSA-R.S. 23:1061.
It is well settled law that the burden of the summary judgment rests on the party who urges it, and every reasonable inference must be resolved in favor of the party opposing the motion. Hodges v. Exxon, 727 F.2d 450 (5th Cir.1984), Dorden v. C.H. Heist, 743 F.2d 1135 (5th Cir.1984). The *290Court must also deny the summary judgment if there is any material…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lewis v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Rowe v. Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- William E. Hodges, Jr., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Intervenor-Appellant v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Benjamin F. Dorden v. C.H. Heist Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Butler v. Home Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2000
- Mack v. Tenneco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987