Legal Opinion
Coolidge v. Kaskel
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 20, 1965PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative.. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi. Judge Burke dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The misrepresentations alleged in the complaint and allegedly contained in the prospectus issued pursuant to section 352-e of the General Business Law upon which the cause of action depends were made to each purchaser of stock in identical terms. That distinguishes this case from Brenner v. Title Guar. & Trust Co. (276 N. Y. 230); Society Milion Athena v. National Bank of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barry Escott and Others v. Barchris Construction Corporation, and Others, Defendants-Respondents, Georgehall, and Others, Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Brenner v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Society Milion Athena, Inc. v. National Bank of GreeceNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Elkind v. Chase National Bank of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Elkind v. Chase National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Briskin v. GlickmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967