Locke v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 105 — Indictment against W. N. Loose for Violating Local Option Law. appeal from barren circuit court. Defendant Convicted and Appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the court by
JUDGE HOBSON
Affirm ino.
Appellant was indicted and convicted in tlit* Barren circuit court for violating the local option law. It is insisted for him that the indictment is insufficient, bemuse it does not show that the petition under which the vote was taken was filed in the county court at the term preceding that at which the election was ordered. In Com. v. Cope (21 R., 845) (53 S. W., 272), the previous rulings were reviewed *866and the court pointed out what allegations were necessary in an indictment. This allegation is not one of those held to be necessary. Since…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
- Wilson v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Hardwicke v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Pence's Administrator v. Nelson CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Commonwealth v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Combs v. Prestonsburg Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- State ex rel. Davis v. WillisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- City of Paducah v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Massie v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Miller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.