Legal Opinion

People v. Mitchell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 10,522PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and from an order denying a new.trial, in the Superior Court of Tehama County. Lewis, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

This is an information for burglary, filed by the District Attorney of Tehama County, against the defendant and one George *237Kane. The information charges “ that ¡Reuben J. Mitchell and George Kane, on or about the 4th day of March, 1880, at and in the County of Tehama, and State of California, did feloniously enter the meat-shop of George W. Vestal, with intent to commit petit larceny, contrary to the form, force, and effect of the statute,” etc. Reuben J. Mitchell was convicted of the crime charged in the information, and from the judgment of conviction as well as from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Wong Ah NgowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. People v. GillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. People v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. HartUtah Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. ElsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. People v. CalpestriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API