Legal Opinion

In Re White

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1950No. Calendar 44,599, 44,600PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBtishnell, J.

Proceedings for discovery in the nature of a judgment creditor’s bill (CL 1948, § 634.1 [Stat Ann § 27.2171]) were brought against Ernest White. He and Naomi Jeans were called as witnesses. They were recalled 3 months later for'further examination regarding the same transactions. The testimony at the 2 hearings appeared to be contradictory. -The trial judge directed the judgment creditor’s counsel to ask for an order to show cause why White and Naomi Jeans should not be punished for contempt in wilfully giving false and evasive testimony. See CL 1948, § 605.3 (Stat Ann § 27.-513).

At the show…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re Contempt of RochlinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. David JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. People v. McCartneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API