Legal Opinion

Biren v. Kluver

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 6, 1976No. 73-432PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs sued to reform and correct an agreement for a warranty deed. They allege that the agreement was to sell a 120-acre tract to the defendants, Howard H. Kluver and E. R. Jacobs, for $100 per acre but that by mistake the description included substantially more acreage. The property was part of the larger farm owned by the plaintiffs, a portion of which had been previously sold to tire defendants, Meyer J. Barrash and Annette M. Rarrash.

Following a bench trial the court decreed that the agreement be reformed to evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gablick v. WolfeAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Lux v. LelijaIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Stoerger v. Ivesdale Co-Op Grain Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  5. Keeley v. SaylesIllinois Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Beynon Building Corp. v. National Guardian Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Ballard v. GranbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. Lukas v. LightfootAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Kelley v. Riverside Boulevard Independent Church of GodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Kelley v. RIVERSIDE BLVD. IND. CHURCHAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API