Legal Opinion

In re Freeman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 26, 1939No. 4224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 43 and 44 in appellants’ application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a method of shaping shoe uppers which have become distorted due to various operations in the manufacture of the shoes.

At the time of the oral argument in this court, counsel for appellants moved to dismiss the appeal as to claim 43. The motion is granted.

Claim 44 reads:

44. The method which comprises supporting a shoe upper on a resistance member in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charles J. Stalego and Wendell W. Drummond v. Pierre Rene Heymes and Ivan PeychesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. In re CornellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
  3. In re DeanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. In re SweeneyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API