Legal Opinion

Love v. Wyeth

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 24, 2008No. 2:06-cr-00298PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR., District Judge.

Although there are other interesting and perhaps dispositive issues that are presented by the summary judgment motion filed by defendant, Wyeth, a corporation (“Wyeth”), the most important issue, and the one the court finds dispositive, rendering moot all other issues, is Wyeth’s asserted bar of two statutes of limitations applicable to plaintiffs different claims. For this reason, the court will limit itself to a recitation of the bare, undisputed, procedural and substantive facts that bear on these limitations questions.

Plaintiff, Tony…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  3. Seybold v. Magnolia Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Travis v. ZiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. Stephens v. CreelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Soward v. Deutsche Bank AgDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  3. Hurry v. General Motors LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API