Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Baggett Transportation Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 28, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 9984Published

1ConcurrenceRives, Circuit Judge

I concur in the result reached by my colleagues but do not feel that 49 U.S. C.A. § 5(9) alone is sufficient authority to justify the Commission’s action under the circumstances of this case. For involved herein is not just the power of the Commission to supplement an order issued pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. § 5 (2), but its power to alter the conditions *843upon which Baggett may retain a certificate of convenience and necessity. A wide variety of orders are contemplated by section 5(2) of the Interstate Commerce Act. Many involve orders of approval of contracts by the Commission which have no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Civil Aeronautics Board v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Board of Zoning Appeals v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API