Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. Pearson

I am in accord with the holding of the majority that Mrs. Pearson’s interest in the forge property has been determined. S'he was named and served as a party defendant in *201action No. 55050. Not only was judgment in that ease entered on the report of the committee designated to assess damages for the condemnation of her property but she actually accepted the $1750 which the judgment awarded to her for the taking. Obviously, she has no standing with respect to that tract.

The situation affecting the so-called schoolhouse property, however, is a horse of another color. My colleagues take the view…