Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1927No. 25,951Published

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action on a replevin bond, the appeal is from an order overruling a demurrer to portions of the answer, the questions involved having been certified as important and doubtful.

The subject matter of the replevin action was one-half of the owner’s share of the 1924 crop raised on a farm which at that time belonged to plaintiff and her husband, Andrew Hansen, as tenants in common. The issue was whether plaintiff or her husband owned the grain. Plaintiff, defendant in the replevin action, prevailing, judgment of restitution was rendered in her favor June 5, 1926. The property not having…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Austin v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Grager v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Jackson v. EmmonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. Boyd v. HuffakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Thomas v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API