Legal Opinion
Chicago Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 17, 1980No. Civ. H-79-1891PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, District Judge.
In this diversity action, two insurance companies dispute the meaning of a policy coverage provision, and each seeks judgment. The case was tried by the Court sitting without a jury, with the material facts having been stipulated by the parties. This opinion constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.
On November 22, 1977, suit was filed in the Superior Court of Baltimore City against three doctors and the partnership which they had formed. 1 The plaintiffs in that action were Ryan Andrew Ely (an infant), Barbara N. Ely (his mother) and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Champion International Corporation v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- C & H Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Aragona v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- National Grange Mutual Insurance v. PinkneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Little v. First Federated Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Guaranty National Insurance Co. v. The North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Highlands Insurance v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1988
- Chicago Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Free v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.