Furlow v. State

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A jury found Christopher Furlow guilty of driving under the influence, two counts of child endangerment, and driving with a suspended license. On appeal, Furlow challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. He also contends that the trial court erred in charging the jury. For reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, Furlow no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. In so doing, we neither weigh the evidence nor assess witness credibility, but…