Legal Opinion
Andrew v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided August 24, 2011No. CIV 10-1239 JB/GBWPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, filed January 1, 2011 (Doc. 4). The Court held a hearing on March 16, 2011. The primary issue is whether the Plaintiffs’ claims, which were previously barred by the one-year statute of limitations in N.M.S.A. 1978, § 37-1-5 in force at the time Defendant Schlumberger Technology Corporation allegedly violated the Plaintiffs’ rights, were retroactively revived when the New Mexico Legislature amended the statute to provide for a three-year time period in which to…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Anderson Living Trust v. WPX Energy Production, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Griego v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- Bellman v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.