Legal Opinion

Noland v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 8, 1850PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error, to the Estile Circuit. Agents. Collateral security.

1Opinion of the Court

,|udse Graham

delivered, the opinion of lije Court.

Park and Clark were parties in the purchase of hogs for foreign market. In the year 1840, having sold hogs in Georgia on credit, they deposited with Dansforth notes pf the purchasers to the amount of $2,687 33¿ and took his receipt therefor, dated 28th December, 1840, which reads as follows; “Received from Park & Clark the following notes for collection, which, when collected, I ant to format'd to Kentucky in a check on the Northern Bank of Kentucky,” and after giving a list of the notes, says, “all of which I pronounce good, and (think) most…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Midland v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Grisard v. HinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
  3. Easton v. German-American BankU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  4. Menser v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Roberts v. Farmers' BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API