Legal Opinion
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Pride Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 15, 1981No. [No. 10, September Term, 1981.]PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
We shall here hold that limitations do not run against the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission because it is an agency of the State. Hence, we shall reverse the holding of the Court of Special Appeals in Wash. Sub. San. Comm’n v. Pride Homes, 47 Md. App. 390, 422 A.2d 1298 (1980).
Pride Homes, Inc., granted an easement to the Commission in 1968 "for the installation, construction, reconstruction, maintenance, repair, operation and inspection of a sanitary sewer and a water main and appurtenances thereto, including service connections within said easement,” etc. The Commission sued Pride.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Neuenschwander v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Austin v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Railroad Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. C.I. Mitchell & Best Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Baltimore County v. RTKL Associates Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Cant v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- District of Columbia v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.