Legal Opinion

Cannon v. Holmes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2016No. Case No. 20150238PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Appeal of Interlocutory Order

Justice Durham,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶1 In Panos v. Smith’s Food & Drug Centers, Inc., 913 P.2d 363 (Utah Ct.App.1996), the court of appeals held that when a judge issues an order dismissing a case for failure to prosecute, but fails to explicitly provide that the case is dismissed with prejudice or pursuant to Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the presumption is that the case is dismissed without prejudice.

¶2 Today we overrule Panos, concluding it was incorrectly decided. The plain language of rule 41(b) is clear that the presumption of prejudice…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Monarrez v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Alvarez v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keystone Insurance Agency v. Inside InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Haskell v. Wakefield and AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
  3. Haskell v. Wakefield and AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API