Legal Opinion

Shank v. Fleming

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1857PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Fleming, the plaintiff below, sued Shank, who was the defendant, upon a promissory note executed to one Norval Fleming, and by him assigned to the plaintiff. The note is as follows:

“On the 25th day of December, 1853, for value received, I promise to pay Norval Fleming, eighty dollars, given for the west half of the north-east quarter of section number 32, township 21, range 9. This 23d day of September, 1851. [Signed,] Abraham Shank.”

The defendant’s answer admits the execution of the note and the assignment; but alleges, 1. That the note is without consideration. 2. That it was assigned to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. McCloskey v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Record v. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Mason v. SeitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Starr v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API