Legal Opinion

In Re Ruth Easton Fund

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 2004No. A03-1365PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

The Ordway Center for the Performing Arts (Ordway) appeals the district court’s order suspending distributions to Ordway from the Ruth Easton Fund, a segregated charitable fund within the Edelstein Family Foundation Trust, and authorizing the trustees to distribute funds instead to other charitable organizations. We conclude that the district court acted within its discretion by confirming the trustees’ suspension of distributions based on its finding, supported by the record, that Ordway curtailed its program for the development of new works. But because the conditions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Toombs v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Bush v. CrowtherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. In Re Trust Under Will of CosgraveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Matter of Trust Created by HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re G.B. Van Dusen Marital TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Riley J. Wilson v. Career Education CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Riley J. Wilson v. Career Education CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API