Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Rice & Reilly
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
Petition to compel arbitration; cross motion to dismiss said petition.
By registered letter dated December 7, 1951, petitioner’s attorney wrote to respondent as follows: “ Although in my opinion your repudiation of said contract entitles him forthwith to file legal action against you for specific performance of your contractual obligation to give him a deed of an undivided one-half interest in the premises described in said contract, being *1034No. 612 Bast Broadway, Long Beach, New York, Mr. Rice does hereby demand that you cooperate with him in submitting to arbitration his rights and remedies…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Newburger v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. Parsons & Whittemore, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Rice v. ReillyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by2 opinions
- Joyce Research & Development Corp. v. Equi-Flow Division of Vibro Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- In re the Arbitrationb between Acme Cassa, Inc. & Staten Island Plaza, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1957