Legal Opinion

Boling v. Romer

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1996No. 96-1115PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Jason Aaron Boling appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment against him on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1988 claims. 1 Plaintiff challenged the constitutionality of Colo.Rev. Stat. § 17 — 2—201(5)(g), which requires inmates convicted of an offense involving a sexual assault to provide the state with DNA samples before their release on parole, and the Department of Corrections’ (DOC) policies implementing that statute. 2 Plaintiffs principal argument is that the statute violates the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Albert Woods v. City of Chicago, Officer Makowski, Chicago Police Officer 16971, Officer Alanis, Chicago Police Officer 5001Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Kaemmerling v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  3. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  4. United States v. George C. HookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Brandon Michael LifshitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API