Legal Opinion

McPherson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1940No. 4 Div. 541PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

We are not prepared to accord to the several insistences relative to the alleged infirmities of the indictment raised by the demurrer thereto. We think the single specific charge, or accusation, contained in the indictment is sufficient to apprise the defendant as to the exact charge he was called upon to defend, and that such offense is stated in a manner as to enable the accused to know what was intended. Moreover, the indictment, as framed, for the sole charge therein contained, is in substantial conformity with the provisions of the Statute, Code 1923, § 4644.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gamble v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. McPherson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Cowan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Lovett v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Lovett v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API