Legal Opinion

Michigan Cent. R. v. Consolidated Car Heating Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1895No. 250PublishedCited by 1 opinion

.Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. This was a suit in equity hy the Consolidated Car Heating Company against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for infringement of letters patent No. 329,017, for improvements iu steam car heaters granted October 27, 1885, to Elmore D. Gody. The circuit court entered a decree for complainant.

Read the full summary

.Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. This was a suit in equity hy the Consolidated Car Heating Company against the Michigan Central Railroad Company for infringement of letters patent No. 329,017, for improvements iu steam car heaters granted October 27, 1885, to Elmore D. Gody. The circuit court entered a decree for complainant. Defendant appealed to this court, which, on April 2, 1895, reversed the decree, and ordered the bill dismissed, holding that the second claim of the patent was void for reasons stated in the opinion. 14 C. 0. A.…

1Opinion of the Court

SEYERENS, District Judge.

The grounds upon which a rehearing is prayed in this case are such only as have been already argued by counsel and fully considered by the court in its former opinion, with the exception of one, which is that there was no assignment of error upon which the court could consider the effect of the amendment of the specifications of the Cody patent while his application was pending in the patent office. The first of the errors assigned *2was that the court erred,“in that it ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the letters patent No. 329,017, granted on the 27th day of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tefft v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API