Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hardman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 4, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Foreclosure of mortgage. Before Judge Reese. Madison superior court. March term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Justice.

Omitting that part of the motion for new trial which relates to the motion to continue, and which we do not deem necessary to consider in the determination of the present case, the official report, which was as follows, states the facts: Hardman by his petition alleged, that L. E. and ~W. T. Smith were indebted to him $100 principal, besides interest and attorney’s fees, on a note dated April 20th, 1892, due November 1st, 1892; that on April 20th, 1892, they made to him a mortgage to secure this note on certain realty described; that they refused to pay the note and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. BertoliSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  2. Bozeman v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Atlas Subsidiaries of Delaware, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  5. Tucker v. Bank of AlapahaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API