Legal Opinion
HippoPress, LLC v. SMG
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 8, 2003No. 2002-786PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The defendants, SMG, the City of Manchester (City) and the Union Leader Corporation (Union Leader), appeal an order of the Superior Court (Brennan, J.) ruling that SMG violated both Part I, Article 22 of the New Hampshire Constitution and the First Amendment of the United States Constitution by not allowing the plaintiff, HippoPress, LLC (HippoPress), to distribute its newspaper in the Verizon Wireless Arena (arena). HippoPress cross-appeals that part of the order ruling that SMG was not a “state actor” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 (2000). We reverse in part and affirm in part.
*306Th…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carbone v. TierneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Town of Hinsdale v. Town of ChesterfieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- David Montenegro v. New Hampshire Division of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Daniel E. Hall v. Twitter, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2023
- Jordan v. Verizon, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.