Legal Opinion

Pearson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1981No. 2-381A83PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

Appellant Junior Ray Pearson appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Ind. Rules of Procedure, Post-Conviction Relief, Rule 1. On appeal he argues that the trial court erred in denying relief because, in entering his guilty plea, he was not advised of the possibility of a consecutive sentence being imposed upon the sentence he was currently serving and there was an inadequate factual basis to validate the plea. He further argues the trial court erred in not providing a hearing on his allegation that he was promised substance…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Turman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bullock v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Jamerson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Odore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morlan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Arnold v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Dunfee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Morlan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API