Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Hoch

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1972No. 98Published

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Sec. 269.57 (1), Stats., provides:

“The court, or a judge thereof, may, upon due notice and cause shown, order either party to give to the other, within a specified time, an inspection of property or inspection and copy or permission to take a copy of any books and documents in his possession or under his control containing evidence relating to the action or special proceeding and may require the deposit of the books or documents with the clerk and may require their production at the trial. If compliance with the order be refused, the court may exclude the paper from being given in evidence or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halldin v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. Northwestern Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Grefco, Inc. v. Franklin Roofing Supply, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API